Climate change or global warming, the same issue

To the Editor:

There are many signs of climate change that the GOP/Tea party is choosing to ignore. I am not referring to the current cold weather but the international weather signs that have been going on for centuries.

For example, the world’s temperature has been steadily increasing since 1888 but there also have been periods when the temperature reduced or leveled off for a few years only to increase again. Many of these events can be traced to the start of the Industrial Revolution beginning in 1750 and its effect on the environment.

As industry grew so did the need for energy, and when industry became international, so did its pollutants of all types grow exponentially. This is not unlike occasionally smoking one cigarette, it won’t hurt you; but once you start regularly smoking a pack or more of cigarettes, now you have a problem.

Why isn’t climate change taken seriously? Perhaps we citizens don’t fully understand its life threatening importance. In casual conversation you may often hear people mockingly say when it’s really cold out, “Is this global warming”? It is more accurate to say “climate change,” not global warming since the climate is changing throughout the world but not necessarily warmer, just radically different, hot and cold.

A cold season like now is no proof of the climate changing but its long steady track record cannot be ignored — nor mocked.

Right now, there are significant world-wide signs of this problem. PBS recently reported consistent flooding in South Florida during high tides when the ocean backs up through the storm drains and floods the streets. This is due to rising ocean levels due to glacial melting and with warming ocean temperature causing ocean expansion. Similar occurrences are happening even here in Milford.

The GOP/Tea Party in Washington keeps blocking any serious dialogue of this topic, claiming there is scientific disagreement since their scientists don’t agree and believe it is an exaggeration for political gain. This argument is absurd. To me, it is playing Russian roulette with the future of the world, (no exaggeration).

Think of it this way: when playing Russian roulette, you have five chances in six of surviving but only one chance in six of not making it. The odds are actually favorable for survival but the down side risk is enormous. Where would you place your bet? Who would want to take this unnecessary and avoidable risk? All it takes is serious dialogue while there still is time.

What to do? Write to President Obama, Speaker John Boehner and your Connecticut representatives, Senators Murphy and Blumenthal, Congresswoman Rosa Delauro and your state representatives stating your concern. It is easy, just type in their name on your search engine and it will lead you to their website.

It is too serious to be left to business to do the right thing. Sadly, their interests lie elsewhere. It is sometimes said: “In 50 years who will know the difference?” We won’t, but our children and grandchildren will.

John Scalici


About author

By participating in the comments section of this site you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and User Agreement

  • jfreed27

    I pledge allegiance to our nation, not to the Kochs, not to
    any political party, not to an ideology, not to the dollar, not to any one social or ethnic clique.

    Our nation is threatened by those who block action on climate
    change. Deniers thrive on delay, debate, doubt, dithering and more

    Every second spent on deniers (half of whom are
    paid to lull you to sleep) is a second wasted.

    In that one second, extra energy is absorbed by greenhouse gases – equal to 2-4 Hiroshima type atom bombs.

    A better use of our time: Remove the fossil tools from Congress.
    Donate, engage, enter the fray, support only those pols who will dial
    down emissions…. and vote. We know enough. Green TPers are welcome.

    If the anti-environment wing of the GOP takes the Senate/and keeps the House,
    we will lose years in our battle with carbon emissions. It might then be too late to prevent
    runaway, fatal climate changes,. so say our most trusted
    messengers, such as NASA, NOAA, National Academy of Sciences, etc.

    Leave the scoffers and the armchair scientists behind. They’ll
    be fine. They’ll thank you for saving their sorry butts.

  • MoS

    Most of our world is living with inescapable signs of climate change. Here in the Pacific northwest (British Columbia) we don’t have to go far offshore to run headlong into it. First came the prey fish – anchovies and sardines – out of the southern waters. It wasn’t long before the predators turned up in large numbers. Massive pods of dolphins showed up with transient orcas in pursuit. Humpback whales, once a rarity, became abundant. Humboldt squid, the ‘red devil’ denizens of the Sea of Cortez in Baja, began washing up by the hundreds on the beaches of Tofino. Green sea turtles have been spotted off Haida Gwaii. Pelicans have taken up permanent residence in the waters off Victoria and Race Rocks. These newcomers are climate change migrants. For better – and worse – they are changing our marine ecosystem.
    In other areas climate change is also happening but the signs may be less obvious, more readily denied – for a while.

© Hersam Acorn. All rights reserved. Milford Mirror, 1000 Bridgeport Avenue, Shelton, CT 06484

Designed by WPSHOWER

Powered by WordPress